folder

Unravelling the collateral damage of antibiotics on gut bacteria

Authors

  • L. Maier
  • C.V. Goemans
  • J. Wirbel
  • M. Kuhn
  • C. Eberl
  • M. Pruteanu
  • P. Müller
  • S. Garcia-Santamarina
  • E. Cacace
  • B. Zhang
  • C. Gekeler
  • T. Banerjee
  • E.E. Anderson
  • A. Milanese
  • U. Löber
  • S.K. Forslund
  • K.R. Patil
  • M. Zimmermann
  • B. Stecher
  • G. Zeller
  • P. Bork
  • A. Typas

Journal

  • Nature

Citation

  • Nature 599: 120–124

Abstract

  • Antibiotics are used to fight pathogens but also target commensal bacteria, disturbing the composition of gut microbiota and causing dysbiosis and disease. Despite this well-known collateral damage, the activity spectrum of different antibiotic classes on gut bacteria remains poorly characterized. Here we characterize further 144 antibiotics from a previous screen of more than 1,000 drugs on 38 representative human gut microbiome species. Antibiotic classes exhibited distinct inhibition spectra, including generation dependence for quinolones and phylogeny independence for β-lactams. Macrolides and tetracyclines, both prototypic bacteriostatic protein synthesis inhibitors, inhibited nearly all commensals tested but also killed several species. Killed bacteria were more readily eliminated from in vitro communities than those inhibited. This species-specific killing activity challenges the long-standing distinction between bactericidal and bacteriostatic antibiotic classes and provides a possible explanation for the strong effect of macrolides on animal and human gut microbiomes. To mitigate this collateral damage of macrolides and tetracyclines, we screened for drugs that specifically antagonized the antibiotic activity against abundant Bacteroides species but not against relevant pathogens. Such antidotes selectively protected Bacteroides species from erythromycin treatment in human-stool-derived communities and gnotobiotic mice. These findings illluminate the activity spectra of antibiotics in commensal bacteria and suggest strategies to circumvent their adverse effects on the gut microbiota.


DOI

doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03986-2