Prognoserelevanz von biologischen und molekularen Markern in der Onkologie : Kriterien fur Studienplanung und -Interpretation. [Prognostic relevance of biological and molecular markers in oncology. Criteria for planning and interpreting studies]

Autor/innen

  • E. Bollschweiler
  • P.M. Schneider
  • S.P. Moenig
  • A. Altendorf-Hofmann
  • U. Mansmann
  • W. Lehmacher
  • P.M. Schlag
  • S. Merkel
  • W. Hohenberger
  • J.R. Izbicki
  • P. Hermanek
  • A.H. Hoelscher

Journal

  • Chirurg

Quellenangabe

  • Chirurg 74 (2): 139-144

Zusammenfassung

  • Experts on different specialities (surgery, pathology, molecular biology and medical statistics) discussed the evaluation of prognostic factors during a workshop. The most important results presented are: (1) the prognostic relevance of new biological or molecular markers must be evaluated in a phase-III prognostic study. To establish such a marker in the UICC-TNM-classification in at least two different centers, two multivariate analyses according to defined criteria are necessary; (2) the standards of laboratory methods have to be defined, e.g.,which method to apply for RNA-analysis, which materials to used, etc; (3) intensive data analysis should be done before using methods of multivariate analysis. The criteria for the presentation of survival curves are given in detail; (4) in multivariate analysis, the Cox proportional hazard regression for survival outcomes is discussed with explanations and examples of the terms relative risk, odds-ratio, hazard and relative hazard. The arrangement and interpretation of a good prognostic study should be performed as an interdisciplinary approach.


DOI

doi:10.1007/s00104-002-0557-7