Brief research report: Quantitative analysis of potential coronary microvascular disease in suspected long-COVID syndrome
Authors
- P. Doeblin
- F. Steinbeis
- C.M. Scannell
- C. Goetze
- S. Al-Tabatabaee
- J. Erley
- A. Faragli
- F. Pröpper
- M. Witzenrath
- T. Zoller
- C. Stehning
- H. Gerhardt
- J. Sánchez-González
- E. Alskaf
- T. Kühne
- B. Pieske
- C. Tschöpe
- A. Chiribiri
- S. Kelle
Journal
- Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Citation
- Front Cardiovasc Med 9: 877416
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Case series have reported persistent cardiopulmonary symptoms, often termed long-COVID or post-COVID syndrome, in more than half of patients recovering from Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). Recently, alterations in microvascular perfusion have been proposed as a possible pathomechanism in long-COVID syndrome. We examined whether microvascular perfusion, measured by quantitative stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), is impaired in patients with persistent cardiac symptoms post-COVID-19. METHODS: Our population consisted of 33 patients post-COVID-19 examined in Berlin and London, 11 (33%) of which complained of persistent chest pain and 13 (39%) of dyspnea. The scan protocol included standard cardiac imaging and dual-sequence quantitative stress perfusion. Standard parameters were compared to 17 healthy controls from our institution. Quantitative perfusion was compared to published values of healthy controls. RESULTS: The stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) was significantly lower [31.8 ± 5.1 vs. 37.8 ± 6.0 (μl/g/beat), P < 0.001] and the T2 relaxation time was significantly higher (46.2 ± 3.6 vs. 42.7 ± 2.8 ms, P = 0.002) post-COVID-19 compared to healthy controls. Stress MBF and T1 and T2 relaxation times were not correlated to the COVID-19 severity (Spearman r = −0.302, −0.070, and −0.297, respectively) or the presence of symptoms. The stress MBF showed a U-shaped relation to time from PCR to CMR, no correlation to T1 relaxation time, and a negative correlation to T2 relaxation time (Pearson r = −0.446, P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: While we found a significantly reduced microvascular perfusion post-COVID-19 compared to healthy controls, this reduction was not related to symptoms or COVID-19 severity.