Liang Fang and his colleagues in Walter Birchmeier’s group, working with the Screening Unit and Medicinal Chemistry Group of the FMP and the campus company EPO, have now discovered a molecule that interrupts biochemical signals essential for the survival of tumor cells called Wnt-addicted cancer stem cells. The discovery is the product of an approach known as “rational drug design,” targeting specific molecules based on a thorough understanding of the biology of a disease and the biochemical signals that support it. The work appeared ahead of print in the online edition of Cancer Research.
A main challenge for any cancer therapy is the need to eliminate tumor cells without damaging their healthy neighbors. Since cancer arises from the body’s own tissues, it is difficult to find a therapeutic approach that can distinguish these cells. And even if a drug overcomes this hurdle, it may not work against cancer stem cells, whose biochemistry is subtly different than that of the majority of cells in a tumor.
Eine der großen Herausforderungen bei der Krebstherapie ist die Zerstörung von Tumorzellen, ohne ihre gesunden Nachbarn zu schädigen. Da Krebs aus körpereigenen Geweben entsteht, ist es schwer, ein Therapeutikum zu finden, das zwischen den Zellen unterscheiden kann. Und selbst wenn ein Medikament diese Hürde nimmt, wirkt es vielleicht nicht gegen Krebsstammzellen, deren biochemische Eigenschaften sich minimal von denen der Mehrzahl an Tumorzellen unterscheiden
Tumor cells hijack the Wnt signaling pathway
Jahrelange Forschungen von Prof. Birchmeiers Arbeitsgruppe zur Biochemie der Signalwege in Krebszellen bildeten die Grundlage für Dr. Liang Fang und seine Kollegen. Ein Großteil ihrer Arbeit bestand in der Kartierung eines molekularen Netzwerks, dem Wnt-Signalweg, der eine entscheidende Rolle bei der gesunden Embryonalentwicklung spielt. Beim Erwachsenen hilft dieses System, Struktur und Integrität von Geweben aufrecht zu erhalten. Seine Aktivität muss sehr genau geregelt werden, bei vielen Krebsarten jedoch ist das System fehlgeschaltet. Tumorzellen kapern es, um ihr eigenes, unkontrolliertes Wachstum, Überleben und die Migrationen zu fördern, die sich dann in Metastasen äußern.
Wnt is named for a group of secretory proteins. Like most pathways, the Wnt system is normally activated when a Wnt molecule is secreted, binds to receptors on neighboring cells, and triggers a chain of biochemical signaling within them. The chemical message is passed from molecule to molecule until it activates a transcription complex that can enter the nucleus and switch on genes. This causes the cell to produce RNAs and proteins in response to the environmental stimulus. In cancer, signaling can become independent from such stimuli, through mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes “downstream” in the Wnt pathway, which become activated all the time although they have not received a signal.
Targets for intervention
Many drugs have their effects by preventing receptors from receiving signals. This strategy wouldn’t work in the case of cancers involving Wnt because the defects occur later in the pathway. It’s at these points downstream that scientists hope to find suitable targets for an intervention, which will only disrupt the signal in defective cells.
In the current study Liang Fang and his colleagues focused on a component of the Wnt pathway called beta-catenin. “In the absence of an environmental signal, beta-catenin is locked out of the cell nucleus,” Birchmeier says. “It is linked to a complex of proteins that ultimately break it down. External signals can release it from this ‘destruction complex,’ and it travels to the cell nucleus.”
There beta-catenin binds to transcription factors such as the protein TCF4, and in combination the molecules activate specific target genes. Over the past few years Birchmeier’s lab and others have shown that cancer stem cells require continual stimulation via this pathway to survive and maintain the properties that make them so dangerous.
It might be possible, the scientists reasoned, to interrupt the interaction between beta-catenin and TCF4 with a drug. Contacts between two proteins are normally very difficult to destabilize with the small molecules that make up drugs. Proteins usually bind over large areas of their surfaces, which means that a comparatively small obstacle won’t prevent the interaction.
The ideal problem for the campus’ Screening Unit
But the crucial points of contact between beta-catenin and TCF4 appeared to be small “hotspots” which suggested that an inhibitor might block it. Liang Fang took the problem to the campus Screening Unit and Medicinal Chemistry group, a partnership between the MDC and FMP. The facility has high-throughput technology platforms and a “library” of tens of thousands of substances that scientists use to search for inhibitors.
Jens von Kries, the head of the Screening facility, is a former member of Birchmeier’s lab. He was already thoroughly acquainted with the beta-catenin story: in the mid-1990s he had participated in the discovery that the molecule binds to a range of transcription factors, including TCF4.
“From the beginning this looked like an ideal problem for the unit,” Jens says. “It would have been much harder to interfere with other beta-catenin interactions that cover large surfaces – imagine trying to displace an elephant by putting a pea on the ground.”
To find an inhibitor, the scientists used technologies called AlphaScreens and ELISAs. The latter involved mounting TCF4 molecules on plastic surfaces in tiny plates, then adding beta-catenin and compounds from the library, one by one. If the substance interfered with the interaction, the two molecules would bind at a low rate. The screens turned up a compound they called LF3 that strongly inhibited binding. Martin Neuenschwander and Edgar Specker, scientists in the Screening Unit and Medicinal Chemistry group, repeated the experiment with 10 chemically similar compounds; again LF3 turned out to be the most potent inhibitor.
This demonstrated the effect under pure, “test tube” conditions – would it also work in cells? Liang developed a line of cells using a fluorescent “reporter” that would indicate whether beta-catenin and TCF4 managed to bind. LF3 was equally effective at preventing their interactions in cells.
The final test
The next step was to determine whether the compound would have any effect on the properties of tumor cells. They discovered that LF3 blocked several crucial features: it interrupted the cell cycle, preventing them from replicating, and strongly reduced their ability to migrate. LF3 didn’t seem to affect healthy cells at all.
All of these were promising signs, but a final test remained to be carried out. The scientists turned to the company EPO, a campus-based spin-off of the MDC, to develop lines of mice with tumors derived from human colon cancer stem cells. The company specializes in creating mouse models from individual patients’ tumors, then testing the animals with a battery of known drugs in hopes of finding one that will effectively combat a specific case of cancer. In this case, all the animals developed tumors, even when injected with a relatively small number of enriched cancer cells.
The animals were then treated with LF3. “We observed a strong reduction of tumor growth,” Walter Birchmeier says. “What remained of the tumors seemed to be devoid of cancer stem cells – LF3 seemed to be powerfully triggering these cells to differentiate into benign tissue. At the same time, no signaling systems other than Wnt were disturbed. All of these factors make LF3 very promising to further develop as a lead compound, aiming for therapies that target human tumors whose growth and survival depend on Wnt signaling.”
Fang L, Zhu Q, Neuenschwander M, Specker E, Wulf-Goldenberg A, Weis WI, von Kries JP, Birchmeier W.. Cancer Res. 8. Dez. 2015, pii: canres.1519.2015.