Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of food allergy and IgE-sensitization

Autor/innen

  • Lisa Maier
  • Yidan Sun
  • Jaanika Kronberg
  • Erik Abner
  • Kayesha Coley
  • Ingo Marenholz
  • Stefan Weiss
  • Ronja Foraita
  • Tarik Karramass
  • Juha Mykkänen
  • Natalia Hernandez-Pacheco
  • Carol A. Wang
  • Negusse T. Kitaba
  • Sonali Pechlivanis
  • Emmanuelle Bouzigon
  • Casper E. Tingskov Pedersen
  • Ann-Marie M. Schoos
  • John Curtin
  • Sara Kress
  • Alba Hernangomez-Laderas
  • Francesco Foppiano
  • Sarah Ashley
  • Chiara Batini
  • Luke Bryant
  • Georg Homuth
  • Christian Gieger
  • Stefanie Gilles
  • Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen
  • Suvi Rovio
  • Katja Pahkala
  • Raphaël Vernet
  • Rudolph Valenta
  • Sabrina Llop
  • Maties Torrent
  • Andreas Böck
  • Mimi L.K. Tang
  • Carsten B. Schmidt-Weber
  • Andres Metspalu
  • Tõnu Esko
  • Aline B. Sprikkelman
  • Catherine John
  • Young-Ae Lee
  • Kirsten Beyer
  • Henry Völzke
  • Iris Pigeot
  • Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann
  • Liesbeth Duijts
  • Haojie Lu
  • Olli T. Raitakari
  • Terho Lehtimäki
  • Mika Kähönen
  • Chris H.L. Tio
  • Erik Melén
  • Craig E. Pennell
  • John W. Holloway
  • Erika von Mutius
  • Valérie Siroux
  • Klaus Bønnelykke
  • Adnan Custovic
  • Angela Simpson
  • Tamara Schikowski
  • Jose Ramon Bilbao
  • Bianca Schaub
  • Rachel Peters
  • Elin T.G. Kersten
  • Judith M. Vonk
  • Elisabeth Thiering
  • Annette Peters
  • Gerard H. Koppelman
  • Marie Standl

Journal

  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Quellenangabe

  • J Allergy Clin Immunol

Zusammenfassung

  • BACKGROUND: Food allergies (FA) arise from a complex interplay between an individual's genetic predisposition and environmental factors and their prevalence is increasing. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to date have been hindered by small sample sizes and varying FA definitions. OBJECTIVE: Identify novel food allergy risk loci by conducting a GWAS meta-analysis in children and adults using a multi-phenotype approach to ensure the trade-off between sufficient sample size and valid FA definitions. METHODS: Analyses were conducted separately in children and adults based on the following FA phenotypes: self-report, doctors-diagnosis, food-specific sensitization, and doctors-diagnosis plus food-specific sensitization. GWAS from up to 16 cohorts of European ancestry including 229,426 adults and 14,234 children were meta-analyzed. Models were adjusted for sex, age, principal components, and if applicable, further study-specific confounders. Sensitivity models were additionally adjusted for hay fever. Replication was conducted in additional external cohorts and a validation in oral food challenge-defined FA cases. RESULTS: 37 SNPs met suggestive significance (p-value < 1x10(-6)), with two reaching genome-wide significance: rs116936231 (FGL1) in adult doctors-diagnosed FA plus food-specific sensitization phenotype (stable after additional hay fever adjustment) and rs8022829 (AKAP6-NPAS3) which was significant only in the hay fever-adjusted model in adults. However, neither variant was validated. Further, we identified three SNPs previously reported for FA and atopic diseases. CONCLUSION:: This study identified 37 SNPs suggestively associated with FA and demonstrated genetic differences across phenotypes. It highlights the need for a unified FA definition and sheds light on its shared genetic architecture with allergies.


DOI

doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2026.02.012